Earlier we blogged about the "nail house" 钉子户 in Shanghai--these are the residences of urbanites whose neighborhoods have been "moved" 动迁 and who are the last hold-outs--they stick out like nails in an otherwise modernized environment. Making the rounds of Chinese portals and BBS in March, this "greatest nail house in history," from Chongqing, which is renowned across the city.
On March 19 the China Legal Daily published what it claims is the first interview with the woman who owns the house. Her demand? To be given an apartment in the new building that is going up on the same spot, with comparable square footage to the house she now lives in. This will be impossible, says the developer. According to Chongqing law, says the article, there are three possible ways to compensate owners in this type of situation: 1) provide housing on the same spot; 2) provide housing in another spot; 3) provide a sum of money. The city is only willing to provide Ms. Wu, the resident, with the third option, but she is not willing to accept a sum of money.
Because the two parties cannot come to an agreement, they have not budged since relocation at the site started in September, 2004. although excavation of the worksite is already well underway..."On January 11, 2007, the developer brought an administrative action against Ms. Wu with the department responsible for relocation, the Chongqing Jiulongpo District Housing Management Bureau. The result was a demand for the resident being relocated to voluntarily move within 15 days and to return the house to be demolished by the developer. If the party being relocated does not agree with this ruling he or she can file a suit with the Chongqing Jiulongpo District Court within 3 months or apply for a reconsideration within 60 days from the Chongqing Jiulongpo District Government or the Chongqing Municipal Housing Bureau.
Ms. Wu's response to the Legal Daily reporter: I simply won't accept this mistaken ruling!
The Jiulongpo District Housing Management Bureau says it will apply for a legal ruling to institute forced relocation.
BTW, I blogged about this a long time ago, I have also translated a full interview with the homeowner Mrs. Wuping. Very interesting read.
Posted by: Jim G. | March 21, 2007 at 10:44 PM
wow, it must be pretty hard to go shopping
Posted by: 手绘印花 | March 22, 2007 at 02:16 AM
Great article...bunker
Posted by: Robert Collins | March 22, 2007 at 11:56 AM
You could look at it and think, “China, what a mess.” But I tend to see it the other way. It shows that, despite the usual media stereotypes, China does have an element of people power, and there are good laws there that people can use in their struggle. And indeed it is a struggle- Beijing is a long way away, and there always a lot of government and capitalist thugs to get through to win your fight. But there is people power in China, and this is a very obvious physical demonstration of that.
Posted by: greg | March 25, 2007 at 06:01 PM
糖尿病食谱什么是糖尿病 糖尿病的预防 中国糖尿病网 糖尿病
Posted by: fasdf | March 25, 2007 at 10:55 PM
What came to my attention, upon hearing this information on the radio, was that the Government was resticting any further images of this area (the "Nail House")to be published over the internet. The announcer mentioned the possibility that the media might bring this to the attention of more people than the government want it to be.
It's impressive to know that one person can make such a deal in the media. Imagine what would happen if this issue was carried on in different communities; if the media kept this up to our attention.
Posted by: Hillary. A | March 26, 2007 at 04:55 AM
I agree Hillary. Images from Iraq have done a great deal to help sour public support for the "war". Its hard to supress these kidn of images, and a good thign to :)
Posted by: greg | March 26, 2007 at 09:43 PM
Me parece muy bien que de una vez por todas se proteja la propiedad privada, y no ceda ante la presion de las grandes empresas ni del gobierno.
Saludos desde Argentina.
ANDRES!!!!!!
Posted by: Andres | March 27, 2007 at 05:45 PM
this is a dumb site
Posted by: mjk | March 28, 2007 at 10:52 AM
I heard that the lady in question wants an relaly silly sum of money in exchange for giving up her house. I have a feeling there is another side of this story that isnt being reported...
Posted by: greg | March 28, 2007 at 05:06 PM
According to a transcript of an interview this woman has not demanded money at all, but just an equivalent sized property. The developers have consistently refused to give her a legal document with an official stamp on it, so she has been unable to rely on the unstamped document they were offering, because as she says - with no official stamp who would I go to to claim my equivalent poperty after they have demolished mine? I think the developers are used to swindling people who have no confidence to challenge them.
Posted by: Louise | March 31, 2007 at 08:30 AM
The situation is not that different here in Brooklyn, USA. Developers want to seize six homes that residents claim are part of the Underground Railroad of the Civil War era. The City has tried all sorts of tactics to discredit the residents.
It seems like the same story gets repeated over and over: "selfish and possibly crazy holdouts preventing progress."
In Downtown Brooklyn, developers want to destroy homes using eminent domain to build an underground parking lot.
Posted by: Yero | April 07, 2007 at 02:40 PM
I have finally got around to checking this out. I am wondering how this person, with such strength and character, is presently making out.
Is she still able to live here and has her settlement given her what, even under Chinese law, is her right - the right to have a replacement property where she now is - and hopefully with the same square footage.
However, it is important to note that the issues are the same world wide, even in a city like Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Here it is the poor that get displaced out of old neighborhoods that are being "revitalized" to accommodate new developments. In many cases the poor are not property owners but merely renters and thus have even fewer rights than this person in China.
Posted by: Preet | June 13, 2007 at 08:56 PM
Ashley Robbins
Posted by: Ashley Robbins | July 19, 2007 at 09:39 AM
can you please tell me about chnese traditions,chinese symbol or any other chinese crap.
Posted by: Thomas | February 01, 2010 at 10:06 AM
I have just finished the article.It is the first time for me to read the whole post carefully,I always just look through the article,and forget quickly.But I had save your articl,it is more than useful to me.
Posted by: air jordan 1 | October 28, 2010 at 11:34 PM
We cannot measure nike mercurial green and influence by the traditional democratic standards, for these men can create national issues overnight. cheap?nike?mercurial can make or break by their coverage and commentary a moratorium on the war. They can elevate men from obscurity to national prominence within a week. Soccer Cleats can reward some politicians with national exposure and ignore others. http://www.soccershoesclearance.com/
LJP
Posted by: discount soccer cleats | January 08, 2012 at 06:10 PM